Bengals’ Shemar Stewart out for Week 3 with ankle injury
The Cincinnati Bengals are 2-0 for the first time in Zac Taylor’s coaching career. But the conversation around the Queen City does not reflect that. Joe Burrow is out for at least three months after undergoing surgery for turf toe, putting Jake Browning in the spotlight. And on Friday, the Bengals announced that rookie edge rusher Shemar Stewart would miss the game against the Minnesota Vikings due to an ankle injury.
.@KetteringHealth Injury Report for #CINvsMIN pic.twitter.com/e7QGoNgM6U
— Cincinnati Bengals (@Bengals) September 19, 2025
Stewart suffered the injury late in the Week 2 matchup against the Jacksonville Jaguars. He did not return for the final 12:04 of the win, which featured the first tackle of his NFL career. Stewart’s defensive teammates, DJ Turner and Cam Taylor-Britt, are also on the injury report, with Turner questionable and Taylor-Britt doubtful.
The Bengals’ defense was much maligned coming into the season after a dreadful 2024 campaign. Stewart and new defensive coordinator Al Golden were the big additions to the club. A poor performance against Jacksonville has put the attention back on the defense, especially with the offense needing help.
But the good news for the Bengals’ defensive reserves is that the Vikings will also have a backup quarterback starting. Carson Wentz will be under center for Minnesota while JJ McCarthy nurses an ankle sprain. That does not mean it will be an easy matchup, however, with Jordan Mason running the ball and Justin Jefferson catching passes.
The Bengals drafted Shemar Stewart 17th overall in the 2025 NFL Draft after that dreadful defensive season. But it took a long time to get Stewart onto the practice field due to a contract dispute. Now, he will miss time due to an injury after two games without a sack and just two tackles.
The Bengals visit the Vikings at 1 p.m. on Sunday, with a trip to Denver for Monday Night Football following in Week 4.
BREAKING NEWS: The Detroit Lions have stunned the NFL world by trading away quarterback Jared Goff in a blockbuster move that blindsided everyone.

The NFL is a league built on bold decisions, but every so often, one comes along that leaves the entire sports world stunned. That moment arrived when the Detroit Lions announced that they had traded away quarterback Jared Goff in a move that has already been called one of the most daring decisions in franchise history. For a team that has long battled heartbreak and futility, Goff represented not just a quarterback but the embodiment of resilience, leadership, and rebirth. Now, with one swift transaction, the Lions have ripped the heart out of their resurgence story, sparking debate, division, and disbelief across the league.
To fully appreciate the magnitude of this trade, one has to remember where Detroit was before Jared Goff arrived. Once mired in decades of losing, plagued by quarterback instability and playoff droughts, the Lions were desperate for a savior. When Goff came to Detroit in the blockbuster deal that sent Matthew Stafford to the Los Angeles Rams, many saw him as a stopgap, a placeholder in the midst of a rebuild. But Goff never bought into that narrative. Instead, he embraced the city, took ownership of the offense, and led with a steady hand that soon silenced the doubters. He wasn’t flashy, but he was efficient, composed, and, above all, dependable. Under his leadership, the Lions transitioned from perennial underdogs to legitimate contenders, capturing the imagination of a long-suffering fan base.
That’s why this trade hurts so deeply. Goff wasn’t just a quarterback — he was the face of Detroit’s revival, the symbol of a team and city rising from the ashes. His playoff performances, his command in big moments, and his ability to rally teammates made him far more than a placeholder. He became a cornerstone. For fans who had lived through decades of heartbreak, Goff represented hope finally realized. To lose him now, in such a sudden and shocking fashion, feels like betrayal.
The details of the trade are still emerging, but insiders say the Lions secured significant assets in return — likely high draft picks and possibly young, high-upside players. The front office clearly believes this move positions Detroit for sustained long-term success. Perhaps they envision a younger quarterback leading the next era. Perhaps they see Goff’s value peaking and wanted to capitalize before a decline. Or perhaps they simply decided the roster needed a reset to reach the elusive goal of a Super Bowl. Whatever the reasoning, the decision reflects an organization willing to risk its emotional bond with fans for a chance at building a brighter future.
Fan reaction has been fierce and polarized. On one side, furious supporters have blasted the front office, accusing them of tearing apart something special just as it was coming together. Social media lit up with heartbreak, with Lions fans posting tributes to Goff’s leadership and questioning how the team could possibly move forward. On the other side, some fans, though disappointed, have defended the move, arguing that Detroit must think big if it wants to break through as a true powerhouse. The divide mirrors the tension inherent in the NFL itself: loyalty versus pragmatism, sentiment versus strategy.
Inside the locker room, the fallout is likely to be just as intense. Goff was not only respected but beloved by his teammates. His work ethic, humility, and poise under pressure made him a leader in every sense. He built trust with his offensive line, rapport with his receivers, and confidence throughout the team. Players like Amon-Ra St. Brown and Jameson Williams flourished with Goff under center, crediting him for his accuracy and decision-making. Trading him away risks destabilizing the very culture head coach Dan Campbell and general manager Brad Holmes spent years cultivating. The next quarterback, whoever it may be, inherits not only a job but the heavy burden of living up to Goff’s legacy.
Analysts across the NFL have wasted no time weighing in. Some see the move as reckless, an unnecessary disruption to a team finally building momentum. Others praise the Lions for having the courage to make a tough call, noting that the most successful franchises often separate emotion from business. Comparisons are already being made to seismic quarterback trades of the past, from Joe Montana leaving San Francisco to Brett Favre leaving Green Bay. In each case, the departure of a beloved quarterback was painful, but it forced organizations to define their future. Detroit now faces that same moment of truth.
For Jared Goff himself, the trade is both an ending and a beginning. He leaves Detroit as a figure of redemption — the quarterback who restored dignity to a franchise that had long been a punchline. Wherever he lands, expectations will be enormous. He will be asked not just to lead a team but to prove that Detroit made a mistake in letting him go. That challenge may fuel him, just as being traded from the Rams once did. Goff’s career has been marked by resilience, and this latest twist ensures that his story will be far from ordinary.
In Detroit, however, the void is real. Fans who had embraced Goff’s steady leadership now find themselves questioning what direction the team is heading. Is this truly about chasing a Super Bowl, or is it another chapter in a long history of missteps? For a city that has often seen its sports heroes leave too soon, this moment reopens old wounds. Yet, there is also cautious curiosity. What did Detroit gain in return? Could this move, however painful, ultimately be the gamble that finally delivers the championship fans have dreamed of for decades?
The answer will take years to unfold. In the short term, the Lions must manage not just their roster but their relationship with fans. The organization has built goodwill in recent years, with a culture of grit and accountability that resonated deeply with Detroit’s identity. Trading away Goff risks eroding that trust. Wins, as always, will be the only cure. If the Lions win, the trade will be hailed as genius. If they lose, it will be remembered as a catastrophic blunder that derailed a golden era.
Ultimately, this trade is about more than football. It’s about the fragile bond between players, teams, and the communities they represent. Jared Goff wasn’t just a quarterback; he was part of Detroit’s story, part of its healing, part of its hope. By trading him away, the Lions have gambled not only with their roster but with the soul of their franchise. Whether the risk pays off will define not only their future but also how fans remember this era.
For now, one truth is undeniable: the NFL world is stunned, Detroit is divided, and Jared Goff’s story has taken yet another dramatic turn. From Los Angeles to Detroit and now to his next chapter, his journey reflects the unpredictable, emotional, and often brutal reality of professional football. The Lions have chosen daring over comfort, risk over stability, and in doing so, they have ensured that this decision will be debated for years to come.